On the show, the volunteers rushed to the DY Patil Stadium field, and they carried the parts that will soon become a stage. In a few minutes, as the Spanish team danced and cheered on the touchline, the stage was set for the final award of the Fifa Women’s U17 Cup.
Like clockwork, jets of golden confetti covered the field as Spain captain Marina Artero and Nina Pou lifted their country’s second World Cup trophy this season – the the first team to successfully defend the championship.
It marked the end of an amazing few weeks of football. And it confirmed what has long been certain – India can indeed be a good host for a youth football world cup. They did it before, when the U17 men’s team came to the country in 2017, and they did it again at the 2022 U-17 Women’s World Cup.
Fifa U-17 Women’s World Cup: How Vicky Lopez and Sandy The Dragon powered Spain to the title.
But when the dust settles, and the confetti clears, and the DY Patil Stadium is returned to the cricket ground it was originally intended to be, what a frightening thought resurfaced. Certainly, India can host an event of this nature, but the country is far from being competitive in such a competition.
India competed in the Fifa World Cup, in any event, for the second time. And just like in 2017, it was because of being the host. Unlike the last time, when a junior men’s team was assembled in previous years, it was packed into an organized camp that included many outdoor performances, the women’s team only almost six months before their first game, and they left. It opposes such powerhouses as Brazil, the United States and the original Moroccans.
In three group games, the Indian team managed to find three points on goal – without scoring a single goal – in eight attempts, scoring 16 goals.
However, this is not a failure of the 21 youth. The blame rests squarely on the shoulders of the All India Football Federation, a body that, right from the start, did not have the foresight to build any semblance of a proper structure to develop a female footballer in the country.
To put it in perspective, the Indian Women’s League, the top senior competition for women in the country – is an event, and should be, something that all young people look forward to. the country to play – more than a month for the first time in the history of five years. For the remaining 11 months, the players are left to their own devices.
Soccer: After the Fifa U-17 World Cup, see what to do for the women’s game in India.
In such a situation the AIFF submitted a bid to FIFA to host the competition – which was approved in 2019. It is true that the event was originally planned for 2020 and was delayed due to Covid-19 pandemic. But the extension of time did not give the national organization any motivation to try to establish the basis of a more powerful system.
A look at other teams
And coming up against a team with so many flaws is the best in the world.
Spain is one of the countries in the world where the salaries of the women’s and men’s teams are equal. Most of La Liga’s top clubs have women’s teams – FC Barcelona’s famous La Masia academy also opened its doors in women last year. And their star from the U17 team, Carla Camacho made her Real Madrid debut last year.
Fourth place is Germany, which has many Bundesliga clubs with their own women’s teams.
“We have two leagues (women’s divisions). Most of the girls (on the U-17 team) play in the second league,” Germany assistant coach Melanie Behringer said. Scroll.in after their quarter final match.
Behringer is a Bayern Munich player himself. She won the Fifa U19 Women’s World Cup with her national team in 2004, then the senior team won the European Championship in 2009 and 2013, Olympic bronze and gold in Beijing. 2008 and Rio 2016, and the 2007 Fifa World Cup.
“Some of them also play with the boys at the weekend. That is also important for us because it helps with experience, speed and physicality. Now there are quite a few players who can play in the first division, maybe next year.”
Similar to Germany, Brazil has a strong training program and a strong commitment to the development of each club.
“Brazil plays in several championships (at the U17 level). We are in contact with the clubs and discussions are ongoing to see who is the best,” explained their national coach U17 Simone – a silver medalist with Brazil in the 2007 World Cup and 2008 Olympics – in this edition.
“Then we will see the games after that and decide the best thing to come for the World Cup.”
In the USA so far, a country that has not won the U17 Women’s World Cup but has won four of the eight at the senior level, the junior platform is a the source that continues to rule at high levels.
“We are the U17, we try to teach them what kind of game for American football and the hope for this is that one day they will play with the senior national team. ,” USA head coach Natalia Astrain said in the mixed zone after their. lost in the quarter finals. “This is the first step. And we’d really rather lose this game and play this way than win and play a style we don’t know.”
“We have a department – the identification of talents – in the federation where people work specifically to identify players. In addition, the teachers are traveling and watching the games. The United States, as a large country, but we have a good department that looks after the players.
Meanwhile, finalists Colombia have a bona fide star of the future in their midst. Linda Caicedo, their captain, started playing professionally at the age of 14, and is currently part of the U17, U20 and senior teams. He also helped the senior team finish second in the Copa America Feminina in July this year.
Along with Caicedo, four other players from Colombia’s U20 team competed in the U17 World Cup.
There is a lot that goes into hosting an event, and there is a higher level of anticipation and investment required to compete in these events.
The President of FIFA, Gianni Infantino, during his visit to India, repeated a phrase that has become an example: India is a big sleeper of football.
In this edition of the U17 World Cup, 21 youngsters from India were thrown into the deep without any preparation. They were sacrificed because the federation insisted on a bottom-up approach to the development of soccer in the country – participate in a World Cup (as a host) and then focus on the try to build a structure to build a team that can really compete in such a game. .
Now the onus is on the same federation, with a newly elected president at its helm, to ensure that these 21 players who were cast in October will see a better way for players of will move forward.